Specific Performance of Contracts
Informational guide to specific performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as amended by the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018) — when a court will compel a party to actually perform a contract instead of merely paying damages, the mandatory requirement of readiness and willingness under Section 16, substituted performance under Section 20, contracts that cannot be specifically enforced under Section 14, and landmark judgments including Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects (2022) and Saradamani Kandappan v. S. Rajalakshmi (2011). The firm's practice covers specific-performance and civil suits before the Delhi District Courts at Rohini, Tis Hazari, Karkardooma, Saket and Dwarka, and the Delhi High Court.
How a Specific Performance Suit Moves
Specific Performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963
Specific performance is a remedy by which a court directs a party who has broken a contract to actually carry out the promise made — for example, to execute and register a sale deed for the property agreed to be sold — instead of merely paying money as damages. It is governed by Chapter II of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. In everyday practice it is the principal remedy in disputes over an agreement to sell immovable property, where the buyer who has paid earnest money wants the property itself rather than a refund. The relief is granted by the civil court of the place where the property is situated.
The character of this remedy changed fundamentally with the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 (Act 18 of 2018), which came into force on 1 October 2018. Before the amendment, specific performance was a discretionary relief — the old Section 10 allowed a court to grant it only in limited situations, such as where money would not be adequate compensation. After the amendment, the substituted Section 10 provides that the specific performance of a contract shall be enforced by the court, subject only to the bars contained in sub-section (2) of Section 11, Section 14 and Section 16. In other words, specific performance is now a general statutory rule rather than an exceptional discretionary favour, and Section 11(1) was correspondingly changed from “may, in the discretion of the court” to “shall”.
The 2018 Amendment also introduced the concept of substituted performance in Section 20 — a party suffering a breach may, after a written notice of at least thirty days, get the contract performed by a third party or through its own agency and recover the costs from the party in breach. It added Section 14A (power of the court to engage experts), Section 20A (no injunction in specified infrastructure-project contracts), Section 20B (Special Courts) and Section 20C (disposal of the suit within twelve months). The Supreme Court has held that these 2018 changes operate prospectively — see Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2022) — so transactions and suits predating 1 October 2018 continue to be governed by the older, discretionary framework.
The Reliefs Grouped under the Specific Relief Act
- Specific performance compels a party to actually perform a contract — typically to execute and register a sale deed — instead of merely paying damages. It is governed by Chapter II of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and is the principal remedy in agreement-to-sell disputes.
- The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 (in force 1 October 2018) changed the remedy’s character: substituted Section 10 says performance “shall be enforced” subject only to Sections 11(2), 14 and 16 — so it is now a general rule, not a discretionary favour. Compensation under Section 21 is available only “in addition to” performance.
- The 2018 Amendment also added substituted performance (Section 20 — perform via a third party after a 30-day notice and recover cost, then lose the right to specific performance), the power to engage experts (S.14A), an injunction bar for notified infrastructure projects (S.20A, S.41(ha)), Special Courts (S.20B), and 12-month disposal (S.20C).
- The amendment operates prospectively — contracts and suits predating 1 October 2018 are still judged under the old discretionary framework (Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects, 2022).
- Readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) remain decisive. The plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness from the date of the agreement to the hearing (Saradamani Kandappan, 2011), and must ordinarily personally enter the witness box — a power-of-attorney holder cannot depose to it (Rajesh Kumar v. Anand Kumar, 2024).
- In a sale of immovable property, time is ordinarily not of the essence (Constitution Bench in Chand Rani, 1992), and a court may order partial performance where the unperformed part is small (Section 12; B. Santoshamma, 2020). Limitation is three years under Article 54 of the Limitation Act — but filing in time does not by itself earn a decree.
When Specific Performance Can and Cannot Be Enforced
After the 2018 Amendment specific performance is enforced as a general rule, but the Specific Relief Act still sets clear conditions and bars. The cards below summarise the key provisions — the enabling rule in Section 10, the special bars in Sections 11(2), 14 and 16, and the related provisions on part performance and imperfect title.
Reliefs Available under the Specific Relief Act, 1963
The Specific Relief Act provides a connected set of civil reliefs. Specific performance is one of them; a well-drafted plaint often seeks alternative or additional reliefs such as possession, rescission or a declaration. The table is a quick map of the Act.
| Relief | Sections | What the Court Does |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery of possession of property | S.5–8 | Recovery of specific immovable property (S.5) and the summary suit by a person dispossessed otherwise than in due course of law (S.6, six-month limit); recovery of specific movable property (S.7–8). |
| Specific performance of contracts | S.10–25 | Compels actual performance of a valid contract subject to S.11(2), 14, 16. Includes substituted performance (S.20), Special Courts and 12-month disposal for infrastructure (S.20A–20C), and compensation in addition to performance (S.21). |
| Rectification of instruments | S.26 | Corrects a written instrument that, through fraud or mutual mistake, does not express the parties' real intention; the rectified contract may then be specifically enforced. |
| Rescission of contracts | S.27–30 | Sets aside a voidable or unlawful contract; the court may require the party rescinding to restore benefits and do equity. |
| Cancellation of instruments | S.31–33 | Adjudges a written instrument void or voidable and orders it delivered up and cancelled where it may cause serious injury if left outstanding. |
| Declaratory decrees | S.34–35 | Declares a person's legal character or right to property; no consequential relief is granted unless claimed where available. |
| Preventive relief — injunctions | S.36–42 | Temporary and perpetual injunctions (S.37–38), mandatory injunctions (S.39), damages in addition to or in lieu of injunction (S.40), grounds for refusal (S.41, including the 2018 infrastructure bar in S.41(ha)), and injunctions to perform a negative agreement (S.42). |
Old Position (Pre-2018) vs Current Position (Post-2018 Amendment)
| Aspect | Before 1 October 2018 | After the 2018 Amendment |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of the remedy | Discretionary — old Section 10 allowed specific performance only in limited cases (e.g. where damages were not adequate); Section 11(1) read “may, in the discretion of the court” | General statutory rule — substituted Section 10 says performance “shall be enforced” subject to S.11(2), 14 and 16; Section 11(1) now reads “shall” |
| Damages vs performance | Damages were often the default; performance was the exception courts could decline on equitable grounds | Performance is the norm; compensation under Section 21 is now available only “in addition to” performance (the words “or in substitution of” were deleted) |
| Self-help by the aggrieved party | No statutory mechanism — the party had to sue and wait for a decree | Substituted performance under Section 20 — after a 30-day notice the party may get the work done by a third party / own agency and recover the cost (then loses the right to specific performance) |
| Contracts not enforceable | Old Section 14 had a different and broader list (including contracts requiring continuous supervision and determinable contracts) | Substituted Section 14 — four clear categories: substituted performance obtained, continuous duty the court cannot supervise, dependence on personal qualifications, and determinable contracts |
| Readiness & willingness pleading | Section 16(c) required the plaintiff to “aver and prove” readiness and willingness; Explanation (ii) said the plaintiff “must aver” | Section 16(c) now requires the plaintiff to “prove” readiness and willingness; Explanation (ii) says he “must prove” — the substantive obligation to establish readiness and willingness continues |
| Expert assistance & infrastructure | No special provisions | Section 14A lets the court engage experts; Sections 20A and 41(ha) bar injunctions that would delay a notified infrastructure project; Section 20B provides Special Courts and Section 20C requires disposal within 12 months |
| Application in time | Governs contracts and suits where the cause of action predates 1 October 2018 | Applies prospectively to transactions / suits on or after 1 October 2018 — Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects (2022) |
Filing a Suit for Specific Performance — Step by Step
The following steps describe how a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property is ordinarily conducted in the Delhi civil courts. The exact forum and court fee depend on the value of the property and the relief claimed.
Documents Required
For a suit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell:
This is a general checklist for guidance only; the precise documents depend on the terms of the contract, the nature of the property and the reliefs claimed.
Key Points — Specific Performance
Relevant Statutes
📖 Relevant Section — S.10 (Specific Relief Act, 1963) +
This is the substituted Section 10 (substituted by Act 18 of 2018, with effect from 1 October 2018). The earlier Section 10 — which the substituted text replaced — made specific performance a discretionary relief available chiefly where monetary compensation was not an adequate remedy. By using the word “shall”, the amended provision makes enforcement the general rule, confined only by the bars in Section 11(2) (contracts in breach of trust), Section 14 (contracts not specifically enforceable) and Section 16 (personal bars, including readiness and willingness under Section 16(c)). — Section 10, Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as substituted by Act 18 of 2018, w.e.f. 1-10-2018). Source: verified bare-act PDF (India Code, indiacode.nic.in) and the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018.
Landmark & Recent Judgments
Recent Developments
Frequently Asked Questions
What is specific performance of a contract?
Specific performance is a remedy under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 by which a court directs a party who has broken a contract to actually carry out the promise made — most commonly to execute and register a sale deed for property agreed to be sold — instead of merely paying money as damages. It is the principal remedy in disputes over an agreement to sell immovable property.
How did the 2018 Amendment change specific performance?
Before 1 October 2018, specific performance was a discretionary relief that a court could grant only in limited situations. The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 substituted Section 10 to provide that performance “shall be enforced” subject only to Sections 11(2), 14 and 16, making it a general statutory rule. It also introduced substituted performance (S.20), the power to engage experts (S.14A), an infrastructure injunction bar (S.20A, S.41(ha)), Special Courts (S.20B) and a 12-month disposal timeline (S.20C).
Is the 2018 Amendment retrospective?
No. In Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects (2022) the Supreme Court held that the 2018 Amendment is prospective. It applies to transactions and suits on or after 1 October 2018; agreements and causes of action before that date continue to be governed by the older, discretionary framework.
What is meant by “readiness and willingness” under Section 16(c)?
Section 16(c) bars specific performance in favour of a person who fails to prove that he has performed, or has always been ready and willing to perform, the essential terms of the contract. “Readiness” refers to the plaintiff's capacity — including financial capacity — to perform; “willingness” is judged from his conduct. Both are distinct and both must be established continuously from the date of the agreement until the suit, as explained in His Holiness Acharya Swami Ganesh Dassji (1996) and U.N. Krishnamurthy (2022).
Which contracts cannot be specifically enforced?
Under the substituted Section 14, four categories cannot be specifically enforced: (a) where the party has already obtained substituted performance under Section 20; (b) a contract involving a continuous duty the court cannot supervise; (c) a contract so dependent on the personal qualifications of the parties that the court cannot enforce its material terms; and (d) a contract which is in its nature determinable.
What is substituted performance under Section 20?
Substituted performance, introduced in 2018, lets the party suffering a breach get the contract performed by a third party or through its own agency, after giving the defaulting party a written notice of at least thirty days, and recover the actual costs from that party. However, a party that opts for substituted performance loses the right to claim specific performance (S.20(3)), though it may still claim compensation (S.20(4)).
Is time of the essence in an agreement to sell property?
Ordinarily not. The Constitution Bench in Chand Rani v. Kamal Rani (1993) held that in contracts for the sale of immovable property, time is presumed not to be of the essence unless it is specifically stipulated or clearly emerges by necessary implication. Even where time is not of the essence, however, the plaintiff must act within a reasonable time and prove continuous readiness and willingness.
What is the limitation period for a suit for specific performance?
Article 54 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes three years — from the date fixed for performance, or, if no such date is fixed, from when the plaintiff has notice that performance is refused. Filing within limitation does not by itself entitle the plaintiff to a decree; readiness and willingness must still be proved (Saradamani Kandappan, 2011).
Can I claim damages along with specific performance?
Yes. Under Section 21 the plaintiff may claim compensation for breach in addition to specific performance, and the court may award it where just; in assessing it the court is guided by Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. After the 2018 Amendment, compensation is available only “in addition to” performance, not in substitution of it. Compensation must be specifically claimed in the plaint (the court can allow amendment).
What happens if the defendant refuses to execute the sale deed after a decree?
If the judgment-debtor neglects to execute the conveyance within the time fixed by the decree, the decree-holder applies for execution. Under Order XXI Rule 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the court can have the conveyance drawn up and executed on behalf of the defaulting party, and the document is then registered under the Registration Act, 1908, so that title passes to the purchaser.
Where is a suit for specific performance filed in Delhi?
A suit is filed in the civil court within whose territorial jurisdiction the property is situated — in Delhi, the relevant District Court (Rohini, Tis Hazari, Karkardooma, Saket or Dwarka) according to the property's location and value, or the Delhi High Court where the value exceeds its original-side pecuniary limit. Contracts relating to notified infrastructure projects are tried by Special Courts designated under Section 20B.
Test Your Knowledge — Specific Performance Quiz
Key Legal Terms
Get in Touch
For Appointments at the Office in Rohini or Chamber at Karkardooma Courts.
Practicing Since 2014, Bar Council of Delhi.
Primary Phone
+91 9999374141
Tap to call
Secondary Phone
+91 7599923456
Tap to call
+91 9999374141
Quick message
sanjaykumarji@gmail.com
Tap to send email
For Non-Urgent matters · Visit Contact Us page to fill the form
Contacting us through this website does not create an advocate-client relationship. Do not share confidential information until a formal engagement is confirmed in writing.
Visit Us
Office and Chamber locations of ASK Law Xperts.
Click any map to open in Google Maps for directions.
